Mastercard simplifies cross-border stablecoin transfers
Can stablecoins become the new standard for global trade if their development in practice encounters complex verification and regulatory obstacles? This is precisely the challenge that payments giant Mastercard is attempting to address in a new pilot project in cooperation with Borderless. Together, they are connecting the world of traditional payments with blockchain infrastructure and demonstrating what the future of international transfers could look like.
Launch of the pilot project
Global card giant Mastercard, in cooperation with infrastructure network Borderless, is launching a new pilot project focused on simplifying and securing cross-border stablecoin transactions. The initiative aims to increase the overall credibility of transfers and remove operational barriers in international payments through the standardized Mastercard Crypto Credential framework. This system is based on common rules, verification signals and governance mechanisms, while the testing will explore new ways to provide market participants with a higher degree of certainty and simplify approval and management processes for blockchain transfers.
Division of responsibilities
According to Kevin Lehtiniitty, CEO and co-founder of Borderless, meeting regulatory requirements (compliance) is among the greatest obstacles to the development of stablecoin payments. Current practice often requires repeated and unnecessarily complex checks between each pair of participating parties. Mastercard therefore seeks to apply an approach inspired by traditional correspondent banking, where verified results of compliance checks can be securely passed further along the payment chain. In this architecture, Mastercard Crypto Credential acts exclusively as a verification and governance layer. Mastercard will therefore not directly process funds or perform the final settlement of transactions within the project itself. Borderless assumes the role of payment orchestration and the provision of technical infrastructure for transfers.
Billion-dollar acquisition and continuous settlement
The upcoming project fits into a comprehensive strategy through which Mastercard is building its position in the digital asset segment. The company recently completed the acquisition of BVNK, a company specializing in stablecoin infrastructure, for 1.8 billion USD. In addition, the card company announced in June its intention to expand its own payment settlement capabilities to support intraday settlement as well as payment processing during weekends and holidays. As part of this plan, it expects to use six major stablecoins, including Circle’s USDC, Paxos’ PYUSD, USDG, USDP, Ripple’s RLUSD and SoFi’s SoFiUSD. Mastercard’s steps confirm that the company’s attention is focused not only on the transfer of capital itself, but primarily on building trustworthy verification and regulatory infrastructure.
Warning: The content of this article is intended exclusively for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to purchase a specific asset. Investments in crypto-assets involve a high level of risk. The value of crypto-assets may fall as well as rise, and you may lose the entire amount invested. Crypto-assets are not protected by deposit guarantee schemes. Past returns are not a guarantee of future results.
Five Years of Bitcoin in the Mainstream
On 19 October 2021, the first bitcoin ETF started trading in the US. Five years on, we look at what really changed: the price, the total market value, who owns bitcoin and how much the price swings. The data show that the bigger shift came only in 2024 with spot ETFs, and that bitcoin remains a risky asset.
Market Depth Recovery: Why Is Liquidity Not Returning Evenly?
One year after the broad correction of October 2025, liquidity in the crypto market is concentrated mainly in the order books of Bitcoin and Ethereum. Although total spot trading volumes remain below last year’s levels, market depth in the two largest assets has reached higher levels than before the decline at that time. However, this development is not broad-based, as market makers are concentrating capital primarily in the main crypto assets, while smaller projects continue to face reduced liquidity.